Install this theme

fuckyeahdementia:

oh no pls dont do that!!!!1! 

tete-pownshend:

i ask barack the hard hittin questions

tete-pownshend:

i ask barack the hard hittin questions

tete-pownshend:

the-star-stuff:

Hold on tight: in 4 billion years, we’re due for a galactic collision!
The galaxy we live in, the Milky Way, is a large spiral galaxy that lives in a small cluster of other galaxies called the Local Group. The other big member is the Andromeda galaxy, located about 2.5 million light years away. That’s a long way off, but we’ve known for a long time that Andromeda is heading more or less toward us at a speed of roughly 100 km/sec (60 miles/second).
The question is, is it headed directly at us, or does it have some “sideways” motion and will miss us?New results announced today by astronomers using Hubble show that — gulp! — Andromeda is headed right down our throats!
But don’t panic. It won’t happen for nearly 4 billion years.
Watch the video here.


OH MY GOD WERE ALL GONNA DIE

tete-pownshend:

the-star-stuff:

Hold on tight: in 4 billion years, we’re due for a galactic collision!

The galaxy we live in, the Milky Way, is a large spiral galaxy that lives in a small cluster of other galaxies called the Local Group. The other big member is the Andromeda galaxy, located about 2.5 million light years away. That’s a long way off, but we’ve known for a long time that Andromeda is heading more or less toward us at a speed of roughly 100 km/sec (60 miles/second).

The question is, is it headed directly at us, or does it have some “sideways” motion and will miss us?New results announced today by astronomers using Hubble show that — gulp! — Andromeda is headed right down our throats!

But don’t panic. It won’t happen for nearly 4 billion years.

Watch the video here.

OH MY GOD WERE ALL GONNA DIE

You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Sylvia Plath (via incorrectsylviaplathquotes)

Noam Chomsky

This is actually a Chomsky quote, from his book “God is not Great”

(via incorrectnoamchomskyquotes)

maozedongisnotcool:

e-schatology replied to your post: autochthones replied to your quote: The…

except the trotskyists and anarchists that fought gorilla campaigns…

Eeeexcept there was no anarchist movement in Greece until the 1970s. There was only sporadic groups of anarcho-syndaclists. Every. single. anarchist I’ve read on the emphýlios in Greece has warped historical accounts. They mostly claim the communistsdeceivedpeople to fight the war against the Metaxas dictatorship while also claiming to have been exiled, incarcerated, and executed along with them - neither of which is true. War erupted after people were being exiled and killed in mass numbers by Metaxas’ forces. And also, many of the later-on self-proclaimed anarchists (who were actually former CPG, SKEE and ELAS, members) during WWII informed on CPG cadres and in turn were killed. You don’t inform on people fighting an occupation in hopes of “fraternizing” with German soldiers, and then expect to be treated as a comrade when it suits you. Because now they say they were killed on orders of the “Stalinists” in the CPG and betrayal of the “counter-revolutionaries” and “turncloaks.” The historical accounts are really conflicted and the left was torn apart because of idiots thinking they can turn German soliders into comrades of the 4th International during a war predicated on Nazi ideology.

a passage from Lenin’s The proletarian revolution and the renegade Kautsky, which everyone just LOVES to quote concerning this period in Greece, says:

From the point of view of the proletariat, recognising ‘defence of the fatherland’ means justifying the present war, admitting that it is legitimate. And since the war remains an imperialist war (both under a monarchy and under a republic), irrespective of the country - mine or some other country - in which the enemy troops are stationed at the given moment, recognizing defense of the fatherland means, in fact, supporting the imperialist, predatory bourgeoisie, and completely betraying socialism. In Russia, even under Kerensky, under the bourgeois-democratic republic, the war continued to be imperialist war, for it was being waged by the bourgeoisie as a ruling class (…)”

The Greek resistance against German occupation pivoting around CPG, ELAS, and the other forces etc, was fought by peasants, working class people, party members, and the general inhabitants of villages—the antártes. It was completely severed from any bourgeois-democratic aid, considering the Greek elite forces benefited immensely from the occupation and the communists were pretty much on their fucking own. How could it be imperialist? Contrast this to how the accounts on the Italian occupation differ, how many Italian soldiers turned to the CPG on their own—having been sent there under duress by Mussolini. The Germans were largely willing participants.

It repulses me how the past has been skewed to the point that two similar accounts on the details of these events do not exist.

Whatever is in the context of bourgeois delusion called nature, is merely the scar of social mutilation.
Theodor Adorno. Minima Moralia. Part 2. 59. (via a-higher-level)
ihopericksantorum:

Hipster cannibal

ihopericksantorum:

Hipster cannibal

[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

partouse:

Starships

Viewpoints: Where now for capitalism?

fyeahnoamchomsky:

Markets have inherent and well-known inefficiencies. One factor is failure to calculate the costs to those who do not participate in transactions. These “externalities” can be huge. That is particularly true for financial institutions.

Their task is to take risks, calculating potential costs for themselves. But they do not take into account the consequences of their losses for the economy as a whole.

Hence the financial market “underprices risk” and is “systematically inefficient,” as John Eatwell and Lance Taylor wrote a decade ago, warning of the extreme dangers of financial liberalization and reviewing the substantial costs already incurred - and also proposing solutions, which have been ignored.

The threat became more severe when the Clinton administration repealed the Glass-Steagall act of 1933, thus freeing financial institutions “to innovate in the new economy,” in Clinton’s words — and also “to self-destruct, taking down with them the general economy and international confidence in the US banking system,” financial analyst Nomi Prins adds.

The unprecedented intervention of the Fed may be justified or not in narrow terms, but it reveals, once again, the profoundly undemocratic character of state capitalist institutions, designed in large measure to socialise cost and risk and privatize profit, without a public voice.

That is, of course, not limited to financial markets. The advanced economy as a whole relies heavily on the dynamic state sector, with much the same consequences with regard to risk, cost, profit, and decisions, crucial features of the economy and political system.